Menu

  • Home
    • Overview
    • Our work
    • Our team
    • Governance
    • History
    • Collections
    • Press
    • Working here
    • Contact us
  • Stories
    • Overview
    • Become a member
    • Crafts magazine
    • Magazine stockists
    • Read, watch, listen
    • Events and perks
    • Issue archive
    • Advertising and sponsorship
    • Institutional subscriptions
    • Membership FAQs
    • Get in touch
    • Gift a Crafts membership
  • Directory
    • Overview
    • Make First
    • Education
    • Participation
    • Craft School
    • Craft learning resources
    • Craft careers
    • Young Craft Citizens
  • Gallery
  • Collect 2024
    • Overview
    • Our commitments
    • Equity advisory council
    • Toolkit for change
    • Reading list
    • Community guidelines
    • Overview
    • Policy briefings
    • Research library
    • Consultation responses
    • Overview
    • Craft UK
    • Resources
    • Join the directory
    • Opportunities
    • Overview
    • Appeals and projects
    • Patrons
    • A gift in your will
    • Corporate partnerships
    • Our supporters and partners

Quick Links

  • Let's craft
  • What's on
  • Opportunities
  • Subscribe
Home
Login
Crafts CouncilStories

Turning full circle: Should we reclaim the word 'spinster'?


ByIsabella Smith

19 July 2023

Before it became blighted by prejudice, the word described independent craftswomen. Is it time to end the negative connotations?


Isabella Smith

19 July 2023

  • Crafts magazine
  • Textiles

A scene from Bridget Jones's Diary, 2001. Photo: Nicholas R. Andrew via Wikimedia Commons

Spinster: it’s fair to say the word carries negative connotations. To describe someone as ‘spinsterish’ is to say they are prissy, sexually repressed, undesirable. Unlike its male equivalent, ‘bachelor’, the stigma around ‘spinster’ is so strong it cannot be used to describe an unmarried woman in a neutral way. (Let us not forget the immortal epigraph by that 1990s icon of female singledom: ‘Diary of Bridget Jones, Spinster and Lunatic’.)

This wasn’t always the case. When the term emerged in the Middle Ages – it first appears in writing in the mid-1300s – it was to describe a woman who spun yarn for a living. Scholars believe that its association with singledom came about due to the fact married craftswomen had better access to raw materials and markets, and could afford expensive tools such as looms.

Unlike its male equivalent, ‘bachelor’, the stigma around ‘spinster’ is so strong it cannot be used in a neutral way

The married, therefore, could take on higher-status work such as weaving, while the single were left with less prestigious jobs such as washing, carding and spinning wool. Nevertheless, it was arguably good work: stable, respectable, self-reliant. Fast forward to the 17th century, and ‘spinster’ began to mean all single women beyond the usual age of wedlock – spinners or not.


A woman at a spinning wheel, c.1900-10. Photo: Library of Congress, Washington DC

When the banns of marriage are read in Church of England ceremonies today, the phrase ‘spinster of this parish’ has of late disappeared. Likewise, in the UK’s Civil Partnership Act of 2005, ‘bachelor’ and ‘spinster’ were substituted with the catch-all term ‘single’. It’s a testament to the humiliation endured by unwedded women over the last 700-odd years that the stigma attached to ‘spinster’ endures to the present day; a reminder, too, of the ways in which craft history is woven into the fabric of our language.

Perhaps the word is due a rethink. In the UK at least, marriage is now more of a symbolic nicety than a socio-economic necessity: in 2019, heterosexual marriage rates in Britain were the lowest on record since 1862. Historically, the spinner’s craft was a source of female independence and financial self-reliance – long before spinsterdom’s association with dying alone, surrounded by cats. In the same way that the slur ‘queer’ was reclaimed by LGBTQ+ people and turned into a proud marker of identity in the late 1980s, could the 2020s see a new spin on ‘spinster’?


This story first appeared in the Spring/Summer 2023 issue of Crafts

Become a member to get the magazine

Share

  • Facebook 
  • Twitter 
  • Whatsapp 
  • Email 
  • Pinterest 
  • ...

Read more

  • Crafts Membership

    Stories

    Prue Leith extols the weaving skills of Archie Brennan

    • Premium
    • Weaving
  • Stories

    Uthra Rajgopal unravels the complex history of cotton

    • Textiles
    • Crafts Council exhibition
  • Stories

    5 times craft stole the show on the political stage

    • Knitting

Stay informed and inspired

Get the latest craft news in your inbox

Follow us

  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Pinterest

Crafts Council
44a Pentonville Road
London N1 9BY

hello@craftscouncil.org.uk
+44 (0)20 7806 2500

Reg. charity no. 280956

  • Our work
  • Our team
  • Working here
  • Community guidelines
  • Privacy policy